Homefront movie
7.25 out of 10
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire movie
8.75 out of 10
Disney's Frozen movie
10.0 out of 10
Delivery Man movie
6.75 out of 10
Thor
8.25 out of 10
Showing posts with label Ralph Fiennes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ralph Fiennes. Show all posts

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Skyfall

Old Dogs

★ ★ ★ ★ out of 5 buckets | Matinee and DVD

Rated: PG-13  Language, intense violent sequences, smoking and some sexuality
Release Date: November 9, 2012
Runtime: 2 hours 23 minutes

Director: Sam Mendes
Writers: Neal Purvis, Rober Wade, John Logan, from characters created by Ian Fleming
Cast:  Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Javier Bardem, Ralph Fiennes, Naomie Harris, Albert Finney, Ben Whishaw, Rory Kinnear, Ola Rapace, Bérénice Marlohe




SYNOPSIS:  Bond's loyalty to M is tested as her past comes back to haunt her. As MI6 comes under attack, 007 must track down and destroy the threat, no matter how personal the cost.

REVIEW: Director Sam Mendes, acclaimed creator of American Beauty and Road to Perdition, comes aboard to helm the 24th Bond film and the third of the series starring Daniel Craig. After Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, Neal Purvis return to scribe Skyfall. Joined by Robert Wade who has written several of the recent installments of the Bond series and Hugo writer John Logan, Purvis brings back the Ian Fleming British super spy back to life. 
James Bond (Daniel Craig, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) and Eve (Naomie Harris,Ninja Assassin travel to Istanbul, Turkey to hunt down assassin for hire Patrice (Ola Rapace, Beyond) who has stolen a MI6 hard drive containing a NOC list of most of NATOs deep cover operatives. With Patrice battling Bond on top of a train, Eve is ordered by MI6 director M (Judi Dench,The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel) to take the kill shot. Eve does and Bond is flung from the train and into the ravine's cold waters - left for dead. Some time later, when M is saddled with the operation's failure, she is asked by the new head of Intelligence and Security Gareth Mallory (Ralph Fiennes, Wrath of the Titans) to step down from her position and transition into retirement. Unwilling to simply lay down, M pushes on to find the mastermind behind the theft of the NOC list. When she witnesses the bombing of her MI6 office, M moves underground and Bond, who had been quietly living off the grid in a hut on a Mediterranean coast, returns to London to be at his director's and country's service. The pursuit of Patrice leads to beautiful Sévérine (Bérénice Marlohe, L'art de séduire), which leads to Silva (Javier Bardem, Biutiful) a brilliant disgruntled former Double O disciple of M whose true intentions are known only to him.

Skyfall is the 24th James Bond film, celebrating 50 years of 007 films. Daniel Craig, in his third outing as the titular agent on her majesty's secret service, again turns the franchise on its head. Craig, too roguish and raw to replace the suave and smooth operations of Connery, Moore and Bronson, continues to set himself apart as 007. Some may like him, some may hate him, but all should admit that Craig's Bond is unique and earnest in his portrayal of the iconic character. And maybe Craig's raw and sometimes unrefined nature is what Bond should be in this day and age. I like the new Bond as much as the Bonds of my youth. Connery and Moore always exuded capable cool under pressure, never a stitch or cuff out of place. Dalton and Brosnan took up the mantle and the tradition of the character in the manner that those before them had established. Daniel Craig's Bond is more like George Lazenby's portrayal, more vulnerable and real flesh and blood. The campiness and over-the-top villains of my youth are gone, replaced by a more grounded and realistic interpretation of the Bond Universe.

Craig's James Bond has come a long way since Casino Royale. He is more experienced and a slight bit more comfortable in the suits and tuxedos that he wears. His martinis are again shaken, not stirred, but he still enjoys a whiskey or beer when it suits him. Like in Chris Nolan's caped crusader in The Dark Knight Rises, James Bond is now considered an 'old dog'. He and MI6 is part of an espionage world that is deemed by the Prime Minister outdated and antiquated. Yes, the world has changed. But with the clarity and reach of global technology, the understanding of the enemy has lost focus. The enemy is no longer just a dictator or an aggressive nation, but groups of terrorists or zealots who do not announce themselves like the enemies of the Cold War era. As the times and villains change, so must the experienced men and women called to defend crown and country against all manner of new threats.

The blond James Bond seems such a departure from the earlier versions. In Casino Royale, the secret agent was deconstructed and returned to a novice position. In Quantum of Solace, we saw Bond go deeper and darker than expected. Now, in Skyfall, Bond is again deconstructed - not as an inexperienced agent but as a man who has left the game and must struggle to find his way back to his former self. His vulnerability is what I find appealing about the character. It may be cool to seemingly dodge bullets and remain indestructible, but the fear of pain and injury makes what Bond does more heroic and important.

Daniel Craig and Dame Judi Dench are great actors and bring much to their respective roles. But no heroes can be heroic without an important villain. The phenomenal 
Javier Bardem from No Country for Old Men creates another villain just as quirky and original as that of Anton Chigurh, friendo-o. Bardem's Silva replaces the mop top with blond coiffed locks and an effeminate air that thinly veils a brilliant ruthless mastermind that keeps always two steps ahead. Silva could be considered over the top like Bond villains of old, but Bardem keeps Silva laser focused and tightly coiled without a hint of camp. Adding to the roster are Ralph Fiennes, Ben Whishaw (Cloud Atlasas the new MI6 Quartermaster QRory Kinnear (Broken) as M's ever vigilant assistant Tanner. Even acting great Albert Finney (The Bourne Legacy) makes an appearance as Kincade, a gun-toting bearded man from Bond's past.

The action is fierce, the story propelling forward as if the train had no brakes. Even when the story does coast for a while with quiet dialogue, there is still an urgency to the scenes or the words that keep the pace tight and moving forward. The entire chase and confrontation between Bond, Eve, and Patrice in the opening scene will blow you away, from a motorcycle race through the streets of Istanbul to a train-bound dozer scooper that keeps Bond from losing his quarry. As always, the franchise takes us to beautiful exotic locales, with plenty of kinetic energy, blazing guns, explosions, and good old classic espionage. 


Skyfall doesn't have the ring of some many other of the Bond films. Live and Let Die, Die Another Day, and A View to a Kill are so distinctive. But rest assured, this film and this Bond are distinctive all their own - without losing what makes Bond so iconic in the first place.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Wrath of the Titans 3D

Like Father, Like Son

Rated: PG-13   Intense sequences of fantasy and sci-fi violence
Release Date: March 30, 2012
Runtime: 1 hr 39 mins

Director: Jonathan Liebesman
Writers:  Dan Mazeau, David Johnson, Greg Berlanti
Cast: Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, Sam Worthington, Rosamund Pike, Bill Nighy, Danny Huston, Toby Kebbell


SYNOPSIS: Perseus is called upon again to save the world, including his father Zeus, when the Titans are released to wreck havok upon humans and gods alike.

REVIEW: Jonathan Liebesman, director of Battle: Los Angeles, takes a Kraken (is that a bad pun?) at the sequel to the reboot of The Clash of the Titans. But tackling sequels to rebooted franchises should be no problem for Liebesman has already showed promise with another reboot sequel with a chainsaw instead of a sword, 
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning. Based on characters and screenplay from Beverley Cross, newcomer Dan Mazeau, Waking Dead, Red Riding Hood and Orphan screenwriter David Johnson, and Green Lantern writer Greg Berlanti extend the tale of the demi-god Perseus and his quest for a normal human life.
Kraken slayer Perseus (Sam Worthington, Man on a Ledge) has settled into an ordinary fisherman's life raising his son Helius (John Bell, upcoming Battleship) after the death of his wife. When Zeus (Liam Neeson, The Grey) visits Perseus with news of a growing threat by Chronos and many escaped Titans, the god of gods pleads for his son to assist him in overcoming the menace. When Zeus, Poseidon (Danny Huston, The Warrior's Way) and Ares (Edgar Ramirez, Vantage Point) travel to the underworld to enlist Hades (Ralph Fiennes, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2), only to be betrayed to be used to reawaken the weak and slumbering Chronos from his labyrinth prison. When his village is attacked by a stray Titan, Perseus takes the quest to save humanity only in order to keep his son safe. He seeks out Queen Andromeda (Rosamund Pike, The Big Year) and Poseidon's demi-god son Agenor (Toby Kebbell, The Conspirator) in order to find another fallen god, the weapon master Hephaestus (Bill Nighy, Arthur Christmas), and a weapon to defeat Chronos.

Wrath of the Titans manages to do one thing right out of the gate. The sequel shrugs off the confines of the rebooted Clash of the Titans and the difficult expectations of living up to the Harry Hamlin original. Zeus sets the stage for when needs to be done in the sequel 
with a quick narrative of Perseus' exploits from the original and an unscheduled visit to Perseus to lay out the quest that he will ultimately need to undertake. When his family is threatened, Perseus must weight his ordinary simple humanity side against the demi-god side filled with the godlike power and responsibilities he possesses. 

Keeping the cast streamlined and the story focused, Wrath of the Titans focuses on one simple concept - family. Ares rebels against his father Zeus because he envies Perseus as Zeus' favorite son. Brothers Hades and Zeus clash over Hades banishment to the underworld, and Hades betrayal of Zeus in support of their own father, Chronos. Poseidon's demi-god son Agenor is considered a 'great disappointment to his father but he tries to become a hero in spite of his failed reputation. And although Perseus accepts the quest to save the world against the Titan, he does it simply to save the life of his son.

With a trio of Cyclops, Titans like a two-headed fire-breathing canine-like beast, conjoined warrior swordsmen who have each other's back, and a Minotaur guarding a prison labyrinth, Wrath of the Titans is a fun fantasy popcorn film that supplies plenty of eye candy that gets better and better once Perseus, Andromeda, Agenor, and Hepaestus square off against Ares and attempt to break into the Underworld prison that houses Chronos. The post produced 3D still doesn't dazzle, but it has come a long way from the 3D debacle from Clash of the Titans that soured many a moviegoer for 3D films.

In Perseus' ancient world, the Greek deities are slowly losing their unfathomable power because human society has outgrown their use for the ever manipulative, self-serving and silent gods. They are so depowered, in fact, that they can no longer keep omnipotent tabs on their former followers without the follower inciting prayer to a specific god. Only the most powerful gods, Zeus, Poseidon, and Hades, still retain a fraction of their former glory. Ares, the god of war, has become more powerful since battles still rage on the earthly plane. The age of the gods is coming to a close, but the fruits of their 'labors' has left the earth filled with demi-god offspring trying to love ordinary lives.

Wrath of the Titans is a gritty, action-oriented ancient fantasy without the stylized reds of 300 or the golds of Immortals. Liebesman removes the silvers of Clash of the Titans for the sequel. Toby Kebbells' Agenor supplies some lightness and Bill Nighy's Hephaestus supply some craziness to break up the drama, but the rest of the cast is focused on the task at hand, saving the ancient world from a more ancient threat.

WORTH: Matinee or DVD


Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

End of a Wild Wizarding Ride

Director: David Yates
Writers: Steve Kloves, J.K. Rowling
Cast: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman, Helena Bonham Carter, Jason Isaacs, Tom Felton, Bonnie Wright


SYNOPSIS: Harry, Ronald and Hermione continue their quest to find and destroy Lord Voldemort's remaining Horcruxes, culminating in an epic battle between good and evil, and between He Who Should Not Be Named and The Boy Who Lived.

REVIEW: Ten years, eight films, seven books, five directors and one amazing author have brought us a literary phenomenon, a $6 billion plus movie franchise, and an epic story of three wizarding friends that changed the landscape of both print and cinema. Launching a dozen or more other children's novel film franchise hopefuls including The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising, Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events and Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief, the Harry Potter series remains at the top of the food chain. A generation of children and adults have grown to love the action, adventure and spell-binding charms of a boy with a lightning bolt scar and possibly the Chosen One against the darkest of the dark arts.

David Yates, director of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, takes a treatment from J.K. Rowling's trusted adaptation scribe Steve Kloves (except Order of the Phoenix), and brings the road trip home in time for the ultimate battle between the forces of good and darkness.

Where Part 1 was a epic road trip, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is a epic war film. An amalgam of Star Wars and Saving Private Ryan - and the culmination of the Potter films that preceded it - this Deathly Hallows is filled with vast slow-motion battles, a variety of creatures, good and evil wizards, and our trio of teenage "Year 7" heroes. Veiled in deep dark tones, and seeped with swirling dust and rubble, Part 2's gritty portrayal of the end of Hogswart's and the spellcasters that oppose Voldemort is both sad, despairing - with a glimmer of hope and perseverance. How can anyone stand up to the tide of darkness that He Who Should Not Be Named leads?

Remember how you felt when Luke finally faced Darth Vader in the third act of The Empire Strikes Back for their lightsaber battle? When Lord Vordemort and the Elder Wand faces off against Harry and the weapon he disarmed from Draco in Part 1, we bear witness to a magical duel we have never seen before and have been waiting for eight films. In a word, brilliant!

I need not explain the story to the readers and viewers since the majority of the planet have read the entire series of novels. That been said, the same fans who will cheer at Neville Longbottom and Professor McGonagall, avid fans will complain about some of the omissions from the source material or scene edits that seem to expect the moviegoer to know the background of the film they are watching. How does Hagrid end up at the end of ropes, captured by the Deatheaters? Some scenes are kept in because the readers would have been horrified if they were cut, but the loss and triumphs of the Weasley family during the final battles seemed more like background noise instead of center pieces.

Once the dust settled and the smoke clears you will be happy to be able to tell people you witnessed the end, but will be immediately sad that the franchise is over. All we can hope for is for Rowling to start writing or releasing the "lost" stories of Harry Potter and his friends, so we can renew our adventures in the magical and wizarding world of the Hogwart's universe.

WORTH: Friday Night Opening and BluRay

Hot Butter Reviews Popcorn Meter - 4.0 out of 5.0 Buckets

Friday, November 19, 2010

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1

Real World Magic
[Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman, Ralph Fiennes]


image from cbc.ca

RANT: Actually went to the theater on opening night for a change. What? Are you serious? Because the backlog of films to be watched in building, I actually had to try and get ahead of it if I could. Now I know why I go to the matinee. The theater was filled with 14 year old kids trying to save 5 extra seats for their friends, constantly calling and texting to see where their missing comrades were, constantly sending one or two out to see if anyone showed up to the box office. And even though they did not shut up during the previews (poor form), they actually sat quietly, or as quietly as 14 year olds can be throughout the film.

SYNOPSIS: Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley race against time as they try to find and destroy the Horcruxes that contain pieces of Lord Voldemort soul, learning along the way that there exists a powerful trinity of magical items - the Deathly Hallows.

David Yates, the director of "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" and "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" returns with part one of the last installment of J.K Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" with a screenplay by the film series scribe, Steve Kloves. This film focuses mostly on Harry, Ron and Hermione, playing out like a road trip movie. But there are other influences as well.

Inside the Ministry of Magic, as the hero trio attempt to find and recover the third Horcrux that contains a fragment of Lord Voldemort's soul, the scenery and pace is reminiscent of Orwell's "1984" or Lucas' "THX 1138". Big Brother is watching and the oppressed magical masses shuffle along, heads down and eyes averted, fearful of being singled out, buying into the ministry machine now spouting out muggle mudblood propaganda. Later, as Ron, Hermione and Harry, hide out in the wilderness trying to destroy the Horcrux in their possession, the visual style changes into something more raw and wild, the colors washing out into gray autumn and winter.

Remembering back to the first four films, I hearken back to a simpler, more naive mystical world of wonderment. But as we all grow up, so also is the magic stripping away and the harshness of reality seeping in. With the death of Dumbledore at the end of the "Half-Blood Prince", any glowing glamour of innocence is gone. These school kids have grown up and are meeting maturity as most children shouldn't be expected to. They face hard times with harsh decisions and difficult decisions.

Although some critics have panned this entry of the series as a teaser for part 2, I enjoyed the film. And, of course, this IS a teaser for the second half of "Deathly Hallows". But that's like saying that "LOTR" Fellowship of the Ring" was a teaser for the second and third installments of that franchise. There is a lot of story to be told in Harry Potter's final year, and at 2 hours 27 minutes for part 1, there is plenty to see.

Worth: Matinee and DVD

I am also trying out a new rating system shown below based on reader reaction to my somewhat complex monetary rating scale. I will give both ratings and see what kind of reaction I muster. A movie can receive up to 5 popcorn buckets. Why popcorn buckets? Because I am a slave to the thousand + calorie delight! Enjoy!

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Clash Of The Titans

What Would Harryhausen Think?
[Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes]

I herd through the grapevine that the 3D for this movie was "after market" and made the film dark and dreary, with no real gain. Because of this, I steered away from spending extra money and opted for the 2D version. And with another movie comes another encounter with people who treat the movie theater like their den. I saw a guy come in with a bucket of popcorn and a large soda, go through all of it, leave and somehow find another bucket of half filled popcorn, come back and finish that bucket, then leave it all behind beside his seat as he left after the movie. All of it embarrassing to me.

SYNOPSIS:  Perseus, son of Zeus and a mortal woman, is found as a infant by a fisherman and his wife and raised as a human. As a young man, he is drawn into a war between the gods and man as he swears revenge against Hades, the god who kills his family.

I remember in 1981, being a ten year old boy, waiting in a line around the block trying to get tickets with my friends to see the original "Clash of the Titans". One of the ushers continued to step out in front of the line to say that the next showing was sold out. And the next. And the next. It was my job to run all around the block back to my mom's car to see if it was okay to go to the 12:30pm show. Then the 2:15pm show. Then the 3:30pm show. Finally we got our tickets and were dropped off at the theater to see myth comes to life with Harry Hamlin and the stop-action work of Ray Harryhausen. 29 years later, current technology sets up the perfect stage for a remake.

Current technology is both the winner and loser for this film. The effects for the creatures and action sequences for Medusa, the Kraken, and the Pegasus worked well. The inclusion of the after market inclusion of 3D as a means to capitalize on the success of "Avatar" did not. Some of the vista scenes looked excellent, especially in the desert, others looked staged and painted. 

Sam Worthington spins another large production after "Avatar" and "Terminator: Salvation". His portrayal of Perseus is dry and understated. He just seems tired at this point. More lively are Liam Neeson as Zeus and Ralph Fiennes as his battling brother Hades. The story is more about the rivalry between the the god brothers, and between the gods and man. Perseus' story, even though the center of the movie, is somewhat less interesting than that of gods whining about not being loved anymore and trying to overthrow each other, and that of the reluctant warriors banded together with Perseus for a impossible mission to save mankind. 

The Medusa is beautiful and slick, the Kraken tremendous, the scorpions in the desert temple fearsome. All of the advances of CGI work for the creatures in the story. But did the story live up to 29 years in the remaking? Would all of the fans of the original be excited to tell all of their friends to go see the film. As with most remakes, the answer is usually no.

Worth: DVD or Netflix